The Significance of Tu Gelu Traditional Medical Treatment: Sociological Case of the Lio People at Ngalukoja Village, Ende Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6852Keywords:
Tu Gelu, Traditional medical treatment, East Nusa Tenggara, Semiotics, Symbolic interactionismAbstract
This study aims to describe the meaning of
tu geluin the traditional medical treatment of Lio people in Ngalukoja Village, Ende Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia.
Tu geluis a traditional healing method carried out by the Lio people by exchanging items that symbolize cattle such as bulls or pigs, to heal a person who is sick from supernatural disturbances or from fever. This method is mediated by a shaman, who carries out several stages in the healing process. It includes
paga(where the shaman measures his chest to his right hand using the span of his left hand) to know the cause of the sickness. This is a descriptive qualitative research with the phenomenological paradigm. It uses the snowball technique to acquire information from informants. It uses symbolic interactionism and semiotics to analyze the research objects. The results show that from the symbolic interactionism analysis, material symbols are exchanged with the patient’s health. The semiotic theory shows that the figures serve as icons; kitchen ash, chicken feather, and spells serve as indexes; finally, the items prepared as the offerings to the genie serve as symbols. The Ngalukoja villagers of East Nusa Tenggara believe that using the tu gelu healing method that contains various signs, the patient will fully revive from the illness.
Downloads
Metrics
Plum Analytics Artifact Widget Block
References
Sarwono S. Sociology of Health. Yogyakata: Gajah Mada University Press; 2017.
Foster GM, Anderson BG. Antropologi Kesehatan. Translated Anthropology of Health. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press; 2009.
Soekanto S. Introduction to Sociology. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2011.
Barker C. Cultural Studies, Theory and Practice. Translated Teori dan Praksis. Yogyakarta: Bentang; 2008.
Hoed HB. Semiotics and Socio-Cultural Dynamics. Depok: Komunitas Bambu; 2011.
Poloma M. Contemporary Sociological Theory. Translated Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: Penerbit Raja Grafindo Persada; 2007.
Blumer H. Symbolic Interactions. Translated Interaksi Simbolis. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2014.
de Saussure F. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Translated Kursus Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 2013.
Danesi M. Message, Sign, and Meanings, A Basic Textbook in Semiotic and Communication Theory. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Jalasutra; 2004.
Wignjosoebroto S. CQ social reality phenomenon as an object of social (studies) analysis object. In: Bungin B, editor. Qualitative Research Method: Methodological Actualization towards Contemporary Variant. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2001. p. 16-22.
Bungin B. Mass Media Image. Yogyakarta: Jendela; 2001.
Mulyana D. Qualitative Research Methodology: A New Paradigm of Communication and Other Social Science Studies. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya; 2001.
Hamidi. Qualitative Research Method. Malang: UPT Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang; 2008.
Muhadjir N. Qualitative Research Method. 4th ed. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Rake Sarasin; 2000.
Spradley JP. Method of Ethnography. 5th ed. London: Paperback; 1997.
Anggito A, Setiawan J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Sukabumi: Jejak Publishers; 2018.
Aimi S. Memahami teori konstruksi sosial peter L. Berger. Society. 2016;4(1):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v4i1.32
Sobur A. Ethics of the Press: Professionalism and Conscience. Bandung: Humaniora Utama Pres; 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Zainur Wula, Idris Mboka (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0